KJ Accepts TMJ's Call For A Debate
What good will it do?
Will it improves Malaysian football?
I don't think so.
I never like debates.
I prefer people to reason things out instead.
People tend to get hurt in debates....emotionally.
It's because the loser will come out looking like an idiot, okay.
That's the way it is with debates.
The winner.....well, he get to go on an ego trip.....and that is all to it.
We the audience.....those supporting the winner get to be entertained, while those who support the loser get to gnash their teeth in frustration and humiliation...more enmity there.
Anyway, as a Johorean, I'm supposed to support TMJ, but in this case, I don't think the prince can win.
I have seen KJ debates.
He is really outstanding.
Remember when he had that debate with Ambiga of Bersih fame?
He turned her into a big lump of stuttering fat jello.
Really.
You can watch it here,
www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeAKJeN5wF8
See, not even Ambiga can match KJ in a debate despite her reputation as a lawyer....a former Bar president, some more.
I really wish TMJ had not made that challenge.
The prince should just let JDT's success on the the field do the talking for him.
Still. now that everyone is set on it, I hope KJ will not go all out at the debate.
KJ, please don't humiliate our prince, okay.
Otherwise we won't let you enter Johor anymore.
Honestly, I prefer TMJ to challange that loud mouth Nazri Aziz to a fist fight instead.
Remember that Tourism Minister who wanted to whack TMJ?
I would love to see him got smacked by TMJ.
I'm very sure TMJ can win that one.
And fist fight is more fun to watch than a silly debate....I think.
Well, what is done is done.
At least it will not be too boring to watch KJ versus TMJ.
Both guys are handsome and macho, okay.
Unlike the other debate - Lim Guan Eng versus Rahman Dahlan
Urgh....both fat fat ones la.
Debat bagus jika dalam ertika percambahan fikiran dan persahabatan, tetapi apakah untuk memajukan bolasepak negara kedua duanya dalam landasan yang tidak sama (?)
ReplyDeleteTidak ada satu pihak akan mengikut kata atau membenarkan cakap lawannya sebelum dan selepas debat, masing masing masih membawa haluan sendiri.
Berbeza dengan debat politik Amerika, keputusan berakhir di atas peti undi.
lim guan eng akan berdebat dengan rahman dahlan siaran langsung.
Yang rasa nak kalah akan "beralasan" untuk mengelak atau "isu keselamatan" jadi kambing merah.
Yang terbaik debat Mahathir Najib tetapi yang cha alip boot sudah dikenalpasti.
ReplyDeleteDebat yang sebagini ,hanya satu usha untuk menegakan benang yang basah ,tak lebih dari itu ,selepas itu benang yang memang basah akan tunduk semula.
ReplyDeleteWhatever format lets revive debate, Lil sis Ms Annie
and handsome(?) Sdr Arul Kanda is a top debater at RMC in the early 90s.
M Zin
Alor Gajah DPH
disagree.. let us educate ourselves accepting debate is one of the method of solution.
ReplyDeletein debate, pros and cons are emphasized
there will be no winners or losers
again, let us educate ourselves to be more civilized citizen
myself personally will accept both arguments and take the one that have more positive impacts
To think as a human is to think for a purpose (our thinking never lacks some end, some motivation, some goal).
ReplyDeleteIn pursuing a purpose (using thought), questions are generated (for example, how can I best achieve this purpose?).
To answer a question you need information that relate to it.
To use information, you must make sense of it.
To make sense of information, you must come to some conclusions, make some inferences.
To make inferences, you must use concepts.
To use concepts, you must make assumptions.
To make assumptions leading to inferences generates implications and consequences.
And, finally, to think purposively, using information, to come to conclusions is to think within a point of view.
Points of view often times concern what we value.
The very reason why we have to be upfront about why we do what we do. For life is value-laden.
Delete*buys popcorn by the barrel*
ReplyDeletedebate debate be my guest ... just don't you gimme nothing
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teu51ZIyLBY
they should challenge each other in sports....football....team KJ and team TMJ...thats more fun lah n must be done at goodwill. i dont even know why they are fighing in the first place. anyway..if the debate happens KJ will definitely win...if he loses he will have done it on purpose. May it be a gentlemens game guys...
ReplyDeleteDebating football, setting standards . . . . .reminiscences
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/dAYeVDKonTg
Sebagai seorang putera raja yang bakal menjadi raja, adalah amat mengejutkan apabila TMJ mencabar rakyat untuk berdebat dengannya. Apakah logik disebalik cabaran ini? Adakah debat ini akan membawa kebaikan kepada pasukan bolasepak kita atau ianya sekadar untuk menaikkan imej seseorang untuk dilihat hebat. Ia lebih malang lagi apabila TMJ mempelawa peminat bolasepak untuk diberi ruang bertanyakan soalan. Apakah debat ini akan menjadi adil bagi kedua dua belah pihak yang setuju untuk berdebat? Sudah tentu ianya tidak adil. apakah KJ akan dilihat menderhaka jika beliau menghentam atau tidak bersetuju atau TMJ ditewaskan dalam debat tersebut? Walaubagaimanapun sebagai seorang rakyat saya amat bersyukur apabila Tun Dr Mahathir dengan berani telah mengurangkan kuasa dan imuniti raja raja melayu. Dan saya amat bersyukur apabila saudara KJ menyahut cabaran debat TMJ. Sekurang kurangnya ada juga pemimpin melayu yang berani dan tidak hanya mengangguk. Syabas saudara KJ. Semoga anda dirahmati
ReplyDeleteI think debate is a good idea. Then we can see siapa sebenarnya berisi. But of course after the debate, any talk must be supported by actions. If not, sama standard je dgn tong kosong.
ReplyDeleteWe need more debates so that our ministers and leaders ada practice sikit. If not, jadilah macam sekarang bila pak menteri buka mulut, orang ramai cringe coz yg keluar banyak sangat statement bodoh dari bijak.
ReplyDeleteHow could you came up with these fallacies. It's absolute nonsense.
"KJ, please don't humiliate our prince, okay."
Who will humiliate who? Have you ever seen TMJ berdebat? It's one sided comment and its unfair to him.
And you still have the guts to humiliate TMJ by saying "Otherwise we won't let you enter Johor anymore." Takkanlah TMJ tu such a narrow minded person.
Please do not underrate/underestimate people.