Guan Eng was freed from corruption charges
causing
MACC to be surprised
Well, a lot of others were also said to be surprised.
At my last post about Petronas, there were those who went out of topic and discussed the matter.
I even got scolded;
Anonymous3 September 2018 at 17:09
Aiyo Annie,
Cerita kurang umpphh lah!
Cerita apek dpt diskaun beli rumah sama macam khir toyo tapi sorang dibebaskan tapi sorang lagi kena penjara. Ini baru cerita best...
Satu lagi itu orang invoke pun bebas jugak walaupun dia curi maklumat rahsia pelanggan bank.
Apalah Annie tak pandai cari isu.
Itu cerita petron tak ada kena mengena dgn Tun M lah. Lagipun petron cuma salah satu pembekal bukan pembekal utama. Ini bukan isu langsung!
Cerita kurang umpphh lah!
Cerita apek dpt diskaun beli rumah sama macam khir toyo tapi sorang dibebaskan tapi sorang lagi kena penjara. Ini baru cerita best...
Satu lagi itu orang invoke pun bebas jugak walaupun dia curi maklumat rahsia pelanggan bank.
Apalah Annie tak pandai cari isu.
Itu cerita petron tak ada kena mengena dgn Tun M lah. Lagipun petron cuma salah satu pembekal bukan pembekal utama. Ini bukan isu langsung!
Yes, some wondered why Guan Eng got away with it while Khir Toyo, whose case was more or less the same went to jail;
Anonymous3 September 2018 at 20:31
Cerite apek boleh lepas tuduhan rasuah pelik sikit..Bila UMNO perintah, ada Menteri Besar yg kena tuduh rasuah dan didakwa.Tiada gangguan sapa sapa dan hakim boleh secara 'indenpendent' buat keputusan bersalah.
Bila PH perintah, kes lebih kurang sama, ada pulak hakim secara 'independent' boleh buat hukuman tak bersalah. Musykil saya semusykil keampunan ekspres Anwar Ibrahim.Nilah cara baru pemerintahan PH.Rule of Law, ye..
Bila PH perintah, kes lebih kurang sama, ada pulak hakim secara 'independent' boleh buat hukuman tak bersalah. Musykil saya semusykil keampunan ekspres Anwar Ibrahim.Nilah cara baru pemerintahan PH.Rule of Law, ye..
Hmmmm.....Rule of Law.....what's that all about....
But then again, there were those who defended the Guan Eng's acquittal.
This is a rather long one;
Anon 17:09.
"Cerita apek dpt diskaun beli rumah sama macam khir toyo tapi sorang dibebaskan tapi sorang lagi kena penjara. Ini baru cerita best..."
Memang 'cerita best' bila, kes rasuah beli rumah banglo antara Khir Toyo & Guan Eng ada persamaan, tetapi 'hasilnya' berbezanya:-
1). Masa & ketika mereka berdua diseret ke Mahkamah berbeza.
2). 'Motif' mereka berdua diseret ke mahkamah, juga berbeza.
Khir Toyo, nasibnya agak malang. Hujung 2007, di kritik hebat kerana incident MB hadiah penyapu kepada Yang Dipertua Majlis Daerah Hulu Selangor (MDHS) kerana kutipan-cukai tidak memuaskan.
2008, Khir Toyo hilang jawatan MB setelah Selangor jatuh kepada PR dimana PAS adalah sekutu, bersama DAP. Ada yang mendakwa, BN Selangor kalah PRU12 kerana penjawat Awam marah kerana diaibkan dengan 'hadiah penyapu'.
Sudah jatuh ditimpa tangga, pembelian banglo dibawah harga pasaran dibongkar oleh Kerajaan Pembangkang Selangor. Pada penghujung 2010 dihadap kemahkamah. Akhir 2011 dijatuhi hukuman 12 bulan penjara dan rayuannya ditolak pada 2013. Akhirnya, pada 2015 Mahkamah Persekutuan, sekali lagi menolak rayuan beliau.
Oleh ynag demikian... ada yang berpendapat Khir Toyo di'kambing-hitam'kan sebagai 'bukti-teladan' bahawa UMNO/BN tidak bertolak-ansur dengan rasuah, sehinggakan pemimpin tertinggi sendiri pun, kerajaan BN sanggup seret kemahkamah. Maklumlah, kes beliau 'hangat' menjelang PRU13 (2013).
Manakala kes Guan Eng, pada pendapat/persepsi umum, beliau diseret kemahkamah... bermula July 2016... untuk memburuk-burukkan DAP, sebagai persediaan menghadapi PRU1 14. Lebih buruk lagi, Kerajaan Persekutuan(BN) seolah-olah teragak-agak untuk memulakan proceeding Mahkamah apabila PRU 14 semakin hampir, kemungkinan besar kerana gusar beliau terlepas dari sabitan bersalah atas alasan 'political conspiracy' untuk menafikan/sabotaj MB Pulau Pinang dari bertanding PRU14.
"Cerita apek dpt diskaun beli rumah sama macam khir toyo tapi sorang dibebaskan tapi sorang lagi kena penjara. Ini baru cerita best..."
Memang 'cerita best' bila, kes rasuah beli rumah banglo antara Khir Toyo & Guan Eng ada persamaan, tetapi 'hasilnya' berbezanya:-
1). Masa & ketika mereka berdua diseret ke Mahkamah berbeza.
2). 'Motif' mereka berdua diseret ke mahkamah, juga berbeza.
Khir Toyo, nasibnya agak malang. Hujung 2007, di kritik hebat kerana incident MB hadiah penyapu kepada Yang Dipertua Majlis Daerah Hulu Selangor (MDHS) kerana kutipan-cukai tidak memuaskan.
2008, Khir Toyo hilang jawatan MB setelah Selangor jatuh kepada PR dimana PAS adalah sekutu, bersama DAP. Ada yang mendakwa, BN Selangor kalah PRU12 kerana penjawat Awam marah kerana diaibkan dengan 'hadiah penyapu'.
Sudah jatuh ditimpa tangga, pembelian banglo dibawah harga pasaran dibongkar oleh Kerajaan Pembangkang Selangor. Pada penghujung 2010 dihadap kemahkamah. Akhir 2011 dijatuhi hukuman 12 bulan penjara dan rayuannya ditolak pada 2013. Akhirnya, pada 2015 Mahkamah Persekutuan, sekali lagi menolak rayuan beliau.
Oleh ynag demikian... ada yang berpendapat Khir Toyo di'kambing-hitam'kan sebagai 'bukti-teladan' bahawa UMNO/BN tidak bertolak-ansur dengan rasuah, sehinggakan pemimpin tertinggi sendiri pun, kerajaan BN sanggup seret kemahkamah. Maklumlah, kes beliau 'hangat' menjelang PRU13 (2013).
Manakala kes Guan Eng, pada pendapat/persepsi umum, beliau diseret kemahkamah... bermula July 2016... untuk memburuk-burukkan DAP, sebagai persediaan menghadapi PRU1 14. Lebih buruk lagi, Kerajaan Persekutuan(BN) seolah-olah teragak-agak untuk memulakan proceeding Mahkamah apabila PRU 14 semakin hampir, kemungkinan besar kerana gusar beliau terlepas dari sabitan bersalah atas alasan 'political conspiracy' untuk menafikan/sabotaj MB Pulau Pinang dari bertanding PRU14.
And I thought that Rule of Law is all about facts....not timing, motif and pendapat/persepsi umum.
Well, guess this is Malaysia Baru's Rule of Law.
Honestly, I was not surprised at all by all these because I had expected it when Pakatan won the general election.
In fact there were quite a number of other cases where the AG dropped the charges against Pakatan personalities since then.
Doesn't really matter.
For me they can do whatever they want.
That's what the rakyat want, right.
If later on the rakyat can't take their bullshit anymore, they may vote other people in the next general election.
Hopefully so.
For now, anything goes.
This is another comment from my last post;
Anonymous3 September 2018 at 03:41
Yes Malaysis baru everything good. Because they don’t steal !!!
So very sure this one....but never mind.Have fun you guys.
Cheers.
Lifeofhypocritical Annie,
ReplyDeleteKeep up the spendid work Annie. Hope you also comment more on Najib's billions and endless BN scandals.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteIf you want to go extra vulgar and use words such as "lancap", please do so at your own blog. If you have problems with certain pro-Umno bloggers, go and bitch at their blog and not here. Thank you.
Deleteannie better be prepared for this coming 'shock' - dumbo to be split into 2 factions - pro Bersatu & pro PKR, nothing worth dying for dumbo wakakaka
DeleteDude9.32: either you are so stupid or totally blind, PH has a lotta scandals, power abuser, favors nepotisme (kerajaaan berok cap anak beranak dan kroni), chronisme, bribes, applies Rule of the Jungle and all their cabinet cap ayam are bodoh-bodoh belaka...
DeleteNoe: Bodoh2 semua tapi sangat kaya..pelik kan..
Anon 14:59
DeleteAt least Malaysia famous and listed as Kleptocracy in Wikipedia under BN Government headed by Najib. Hahahaha
it's 2 x 5 la for both sides... apo nak dikato.. u guys have voted them in, this is what u get la. it wud have been better, if the trial continues and that will give this guy and that woman the chance to clear their names.. otherwise it will be subject to many interpretations.. i m not terkejut despite many terkejut beruk yesterday.. well a lot of wayang kulit la yesterday.. "i m shocked" kind of statements.. what la, we r not stupid, we know how sincere one can be when he/she opens his/her mouth.. credibility is at stake here.. dont take people for granted..
ReplyDeleteHeh heh heh.
ReplyDeleteSooooooooo predictable lah you, Annie.
Every Umgnok macai blogger whoops Very Neutral is saying the same.
Like synchronised parrots.
Ahhhhh, “rule of law”, “corruption”, “cost of living”, “welfare of the rakyat”.
All the things that every Umgnok macai didn’t give a f*** about before, SUDDENLY you are concerned by.
Embarrassing, no?
Give you just 2 examples (plenty more, just ask ya : )
CASE 1:
The NFC scandal. Overwhelming DOCUMENTARY evidence of what the cowmama did. Yes folks, your money (only 250 million, lah) really got converted to condos. Lembu money became penthouses and Mercedes.
How was this dropped?
Because Shafee the 9.5 million man wrote a letter - A PRIVATE LETTER - to Apandi Babi, who then dropped the charges.
To repeat:
Jibby’s deeply corrupt lawyer wrote a letter - A PRIVATE LETTER - to Jibby’s deeply corrupt hand-picked stooge A-G who let him escape from 1MDB charges.
Result?
We got shafted for all 250 million, and the crooks kept their loot.
What the Umgnok macai said at the time:
“Oh, the A-G has full power to drop charges, so shaddap.”
I wonder if Annie’s archive has an article condemning this dropping of charges?
Ehhhhh, but Annie cares about us so much? She cares deeply about “rule of law”, “corruption”, “cost of living”, “welfare of the rakyat”, right? And dead dogs and pizza price?
Mesti ada, kan?
Heh heh heh.
This is what the mat salleh call “rank hypocrisy”.
Anon 09:59
DeleteOooops
TERKEJUT! TERKEJUT! TERKEJUT
Professor Nasi Lemak
Prof Nasty Berak,
DeleteHeart attack ke bro?
You forgot your last "!"...
Dedak very bad for cholesterol, OK?
our justice system is the pits and the judges are highly questionable.
DeleteMadey kata dia terkejut kes lim guan eng gugur.
DeleteRakyat pula terkejut;
•harga barang semakin mahal selepas SST.
•Tol masih tak mansuh.
•Ptptn tetap kena bayar.
•Anak Mahathir dapat sapu projek kerajaan.
•Menteri suruh nelayan tanam nenas.
•Br1m dihapuskan.
Tragedi September. 1 September rakyat ditipu dengan SST. Hari ini 3 September sistem keadilan telah mati. Gara2 kerajaan PH, Thomas dan Mahathir. nepotisme dan kronisme sangat berleluasa. Berbohong, flip flop, bodoh, u-turn, slow-slow tipu, rule of jungle mainan PH. Manifesto dicapati, lembu punya susu kata sendiri punya..puiii...kerajaan berok. new Malaysia..tepuk! tepuk!..eiii..what happened to that Tabung Harapan anyway? macai bodoh pi derma lagi ke..bahalul.
DeleteKesimpulannya,
DeleteSPRM amat terkejut
PM pun terkejut
Persatuan Peguam terkejut
Hakim pun terkejut
Ramkarpal terkejut
Lim Guan Eng pun dikatakan terkejut
Tommy Thomas pun boleh terkejut kalau Lim Guan Eng pun terkejut
Shame on you Kerajaan PH. Ini Malaysia Baharulah. Negara Bolehland.
Rakyat dah senang sejak pru14. Boleh je bayar semua kenaikan2 ni. Tiba2 je senang. Dulu je memekik2 harga tinggi, kos sara hidup tinggi, berlakon berdiri tepi2 jalan pegang sepanduk petrol tinggi dan mansuh tol, mcm2 la. Dulu je. Sekarang dah senang. Terima kasih ph!!!!
Deletebelajarah seperti azmin bagaimana boleh ada kartel..boleh jadi kroni atok M.. boleh ada acc di luar negara berjuta ringgit.. isterinya drp awal akaun sudah ada berjuta2.. itulah namanya kesetiaan kepada atok dan kartel!
DeleteLol. @MOFmalaysia such a joke. Kira pun salah. Dulu LGE menteri kewangan salah titik perpuluhan. Lol. Tah pape
DeleteAnnie,
ReplyDeleteI never believed LGE to be guilty.
My recollection of the case was that the property was offered at a price to LGE's wife and that price was honoured despite the passage of years and movements in the property market.
I know others may disagree but that's my view, sorry.
Gladiator
DeleteProtecting the Malays, Umno style…
The Swiss A-G told Pandi Babi that USD800 million had been stolen from KWAP, and the Swiss had all the evidence needed.
This was Pandi Babi’s response, to protect the Malay civil servants’ pensions….
“KUALA LUMPUR: Former Attorney-General (AG) Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali had refused to extend his cooperation while helming the office, claimed Swiss AG Michael Lauber.
According to Malaysiakini, Lauber said this after a meeting with his Malaysian counterpart Tommy Thomas yesterday.
“Since 2015, (we have been) conducting our investigations in Switzerland and from the beginning, we tried to cooperate very closely together with the United States, Singapore, Luxembourg,” the online portal quoted Lauber as saying.
Lauber also reportedly said Switzerland had tried to cooperate with Malaysia.
"...but at that time, in 2016, we got confirmation that the Malaysian attorney-general that time didn't want to cooperate with us," he was quoted as saying.
Malaysiakini also reported that the Switzerland’s Office of the Attorney General (OAG) had requested for mutual legal assistance from Malaysia on two occasions, but received no response in return.”
Don’t worry, just search through Annie’s blog archive.
I GUARANTEE she condemned Pandi and wanted justice for the Malay civil servants.
Oppssss…
My mistake.
She kept her mouth shut like a true Very Very Neutral Macai : )
Kipidap, Annie!
Dongibab!
i don't believed DSN is guilty. the KERA gov is too scared to prosecute him..hahah...
DeleteU are right..its definitely going to be fun for quite some time. More flip flop, more drama plot and twist and more climax and anti climax from the newly formed government that got in power based on drama.
ReplyDeleteWell who doesnt love drama..certainly Malaysian celebrate drama..
Another comment by a netizen why charge on LGE was dropped....HEHEHEHE
ReplyDeleteTo those who are claiming this is proof the new Pakatan Gov is no different to BN, please understand the facts of this case before passing judgement._
The issue with this property purchase was not the value of the house itself. But the allegation that he bought the house under value in return for selling the state Gov land at Taman Manggis below market price.
But what most people dont know is that land was first offered to Gerakan but Gerakan couldnt come up with the money. The state gov then held an open tender which LGE excused himself from because of conflict of interest. After months of negotiations, the tender was subsequently to KLIDC.
BN was harping on the price of the house but to date did not come up with any proof linking the sale of the house to the land sale. That's what the court was supposed to find out._
Selling a property below value is not a crime. It's a willing seller willing buyer deal. In order to find LGE guilty the court needed to prove that the lower price of the house was an inducement to the Hb sale of the land. That clearly did not happen because it was an open tender. Hence the aquittal of LGE.
September 4, 2018 at 10:34 AM Delete
Dulu sorang tu bagitaik.
ReplyDelete" Power Corrupts "
"Absolute Power Kurap Absolutely "
Ni baru simple majorii. Mcm2 new normal dah berlaku.
Spt dia kata baru2 Ni, Malay(bukan Melayu) bodoh bodoh bodoh.
Yes dear Annie, if the rakyat is not satisfied, they can choose a new coalition...which one is best? One which approves a 47yr old man to marry an 11yr old girl, condones public whipping and subjects their rakyat to life of poverty and misery so that they can attain their path to Paradise, together with a party that shamelessly inflates cost of projects and asks for 10% advance before signing the letter of award, condones 'cash is king' attitude by giving one off payments every year while their princes live like kings and emirs with their ferraris and luxury yachts all funded by the country's coffers?
ReplyDeleteJust by a few questionable incidents, you and your same minded kind, start condemning the new govt while kissing up to the previous govt that openly flaunts its corrupt practices and terms the corruption as rezeki from Tuhan...
The differences are:
ReplyDelete(1)KT- poor salesmanship
Seller lost alot of money
(2)LGE-good salesmanship
Seller sold with profit
Both cases are distinctively different
A comparision:
What is the difference between a good girl and a nice girl?
A good girl goes on a date, goes home and go to bed
A nice girl goes on date, goes to bed and goes home
Fadzireen
Wah....suddenly our neutral Annie become so holy holy talk about justice, rule of law and all that .
ReplyDeleteBefore that she is quiet like a mouse when it comes to BN's atrocious past record.
Heh heh heh.....
DeleteYes, Anonymous4 September 2018 at 10:52.
This is the perangai of a True Macai Umgnok.
They are the worst munafiq.
And they fool nobody.
Well, since you all accuse me of being silent in the past, please read this previous post of mine;
Deletehttps://lifeofaannie.blogspot.com/2015/07/i-can-understand-muhyiddins-sacking-but.html
There were others. Do check the archive of this blog. Thank you.
Hello Annie, please refer to the 1st trial,
ReplyDelete"Judge Hadhariah justified that so far the prosecution had called 25 witnesses to testify in the trial last March and now in September the prosecution had asked the case to be discharged not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA). She said – “Six months later, the prosecution may call for other witnesses. There is no such thing especially in public interest case.”
So that's it
Peod Nasi Lemak,,
ReplyDelete//Oooops
TERKEJUT! TERKEJUT! TERKEJUT//
Wake up, bro!!
Tak de lagi nak post ke?
You are caught up in a loop!!
You said exactly the same thing over in Annie's previous article
//Fuel of choice - Petronas//
at
//Unknown4 September 2018 at 02:57//
and elsewhere!!
HAHAHAHAH!!
Thks for the laughs :)
I knew I did the right thing by encouraging you to keep posting comments.
It gives everybody the opportunity to see the quality of an UMNO/PAS supporter :)
HAHAHAHAH!!
Pls, pls. pls do keep contributing to Annie's blog.
With your hel0, she will hit 10million pages views!!
HAHAHAHAH!!!
Gladiator
hahaha the term resident clown suits this nasi lemak clown very2 well...
Deleteannine nothing to be "ter-kecut". is the prosecutors the same "species" from the previous BN "perombak" gang.
ReplyDeleteas far as it is only the AG is new.
also before GE14 the BN "perombak" already being rumoured droppin this LGE tokong korupsi case, becos he got hundreds of lawyers to defence him "pr0-bono" and it will take years to settle, becos found guilty, appeal re-appeal re-reappeal......but the prosecutions will have heavy fees charged......
the BN "perombak" has no money to continue the case even if won GE14.
The AGC should have let the courts decide instead of dropping the charges.Unless there are good reasons to do so. The AGC should come out to explain why the charges were dropped. Most Malaysians voted a new govt because they want a clean, transparent and efficient govt. This is so disappointing.
ReplyDeleteHehehehe
ReplyDeleteJamal pecah botoi kena buru merata dunia.. masuk penjara.
Kekekekeke
TERKEJUT! TERKEJUT! TERKEJUT!
Professor Nasi Lemak
Tak payah buru merata dunia...Jamal Jamban jaguh kampong je bab ada Najib ...lari kat Indon je...
Delete
ReplyDeleteUnknown @ 4 September 2018 at 13:48 aka Prof Nasi Lemak,
//TERKEJUT! TERKEJUT! TERKEJUT!//
Aiyoh!!
Still caught in the loop?
You better snap out of it or you will get ignored for being boring :)
Hehehehe!!
Gladiator
anon 4 September 2018 at 13:39
Deletehttps://www.malaysiakini.com/news/441625
nothing to do with the AG thommy thomas
even during the ex-AG "ah-pund-deki" time already rumor to drop the case
the PAKATAN HARAPAN goverment AG know nothing about it, but the previous BN "perombak" AG "ah-pund-deki" may know. cannot drop case becos near GE14. rumor after if win GE14 only do to look "credible"
The Prof Pokpek Cutpaste has graduated from POKPEK to TERKEJUT......this is the mentality of DUMNO bloggers....only know how to cut & paste and make noise like parrot. hahaha
ReplyDeleteAiyo Annie! nothing unusual la...dlm kes ini court telah beri DAA -discharge amounting to an acguittal..come on la Annie! cerita la abot ur kes najib, how come ur UMNO judge can simply give a blanket gag order ? cete la bag hermis sikit.. baru adil
ReplyDeleteEngko la cete. Kan aku publish komen korang.
DeleteKalau kau tak publish komen, tak ada orang mau baca blog mu Annie. Jangan sombong sangat
DeleteAku sombong? Suka hati engko lah. Aku nak cakap macam mana lagi.
DeleteTeringat your posting on Animal farm.Sejibik macam kes sekarang.
ReplyDeleteSebelum dapat kuasa, kata kata "Rule of Law" sentiasa dimain-mainkan untuk halwa telinga.
Selepas dapat kuasa, segala cara akan digunakan untuk mengekalkan kuasa.Rule of Law, my foot.
Apehal lah letak gambar apek dalam keedaan yang paling orang lain tak suka..Gambar lain ke takde ke.Bika tengok gambar, nampak macam orang yg sombong dan angkoh.macam aku nak luku je kepala dia.
ReplyDeletehttp://syedsoutsidethebox.blogspot.com/2018/09/it-was-not-acquittal-ag-withdrew-charges.html?m=1
ReplyDeletePulak...Mintak AG yg paling layak abad ini bagi komen.Kalau tak, elok letak jawatan je.Hampeh.
Hi Annie,
ReplyDeleteTommy Thomas not at all involve in this decision. Secondly a new DPP that is not involve at all in this case got the case files to evaluate possible charges. A recommendation is made by the DPP base on the evidences and the judge formality ruling.
Secondly, the evidence is weak. Take into account when the biz person bought the house at 2.5 mil and sold at 2.8 mil to LGE. She did not even make a capital loss but factor in possible market price, then only possible consider a loss. And LGE stay at the house for 5 years before looking chance to buy it as people wants to own their home then keep in paying rental. For Khir Toyo, the dev bought at 6 million and sell to Khir at 3 mil. Very clear make a loss and that is not consider market price...if consider market price, much more given. So this raise higher suspicion. Also in the approval process, what is the role between Khir and LGE? Is LGE personally involve in the committee meetings to grant to specific developer? of its a proposal from the committee? Is Khir directly direct its given to the developer? So, this has to play out in the court. Of course the AG Chamber will look which is stronger case and goes for it to avoid tax paying wasted. We don't see the facts to know, but it's a play by opposing party using the court as political perception and tool to push their case.....
Kah kah...Ko ingat rakyat bodoh ke..
DeleteKan lagi senang biarkan hakim yg tentukan bukan pegawai AGC.So MACC officers must be very stupid then .
I agree with Anon 5sep18@14:46
DeleteIt's kinda scary knowing these same people during Najib's reign calling it quit on LGE's case.
What if this happens to Najib's case/s too ?